Hello
For years I have not called myself "Amerikan" or aa "US-Amerikan", but instead I identify myself as a Cascadian. You ask "where the hell is Cascadia?" Cascadia is the "Pacific NorthWest" and specifically its not a "nation-state", but is a bioregion that currently transcends political borders. Ok now you may ask "what the hell is a bioregion?" ... well it is some geographers and environmentally aware people explain as:
“Bioregions are geographic areas having common characteristics of soil, watershed, climate, native plants and animals that exist within the whole planetary biosphere as unique and contributive parts.... A bioregion refers both to geographical terrain and a terrain of consciousness -- to a place and the ideas that have developed about how to live in that place.... A bioregion can be determined initially by use of climatology, physiography, animal and plant geography, natural history and other descriptive natural sciences. The final boundaries of a bioregion, however, are best described by the people who have lived within it, through human recognition of the realities of living in place.... there is a distinctive resonance among living things and the factors that influence them which occurs specifically within each separate part of the planet. Discovering and describing that resonance is a way to describe a bioregion.” www.olywa.net/speech/may9...closkey.html
Cascadia is a bioregion encompassing the territories of the Alaskan Panhandle, British Columbia, Idaho, Washington, Oregon, northern California and western Montana as well as very small portions of other near by states and provinces.
Cascadia is geographically the Columbia River Watershed and the area around the Cascade Range. Cascadia's farthest extent is from northern California to the Alaskan Panhandle and from the Pacific to the Continental Divide. Cascadia Minor tends to be the states of northern California, Oregon and Washington with the province of British Columbia. The Scottish naturalist David Douglas named the Cascade mountain range after the powerful waterfalls that carved out this land and gave it so much biomass.
So why not instead of all of us south Cascadians flocking to Canada we could suggest Oregon, Washington, northern California, Idaho and western Montana with the Alaskan panhandle re-unify with British Columbia as part of Canada. This region was once considered a one region before the US under expansionist policies by president Jackson and Polk divided the region. It could be a campaign like after the fall of the Berlin Wall to re-unify Germany: "Re-unification of Cascadia!" Just imagine Seattle, Portland, San Fransisco, Vancouver (BC), Victoria and the whole Cascadian bioregion (rural and urban) working together either as Cascadia or under a Canadian Confederation.
cascadians.tribe.net
For years I have not called myself "Amerikan" or aa "US-Amerikan", but instead I identify myself as a Cascadian. You ask "where the hell is Cascadia?" Cascadia is the "Pacific NorthWest" and specifically its not a "nation-state", but is a bioregion that currently transcends political borders. Ok now you may ask "what the hell is a bioregion?" ... well it is some geographers and environmentally aware people explain as:
“Bioregions are geographic areas having common characteristics of soil, watershed, climate, native plants and animals that exist within the whole planetary biosphere as unique and contributive parts.... A bioregion refers both to geographical terrain and a terrain of consciousness -- to a place and the ideas that have developed about how to live in that place.... A bioregion can be determined initially by use of climatology, physiography, animal and plant geography, natural history and other descriptive natural sciences. The final boundaries of a bioregion, however, are best described by the people who have lived within it, through human recognition of the realities of living in place.... there is a distinctive resonance among living things and the factors that influence them which occurs specifically within each separate part of the planet. Discovering and describing that resonance is a way to describe a bioregion.” www.olywa.net/speech/may9...closkey.html
Cascadia is a bioregion encompassing the territories of the Alaskan Panhandle, British Columbia, Idaho, Washington, Oregon, northern California and western Montana as well as very small portions of other near by states and provinces.
Cascadia is geographically the Columbia River Watershed and the area around the Cascade Range. Cascadia's farthest extent is from northern California to the Alaskan Panhandle and from the Pacific to the Continental Divide. Cascadia Minor tends to be the states of northern California, Oregon and Washington with the province of British Columbia. The Scottish naturalist David Douglas named the Cascade mountain range after the powerful waterfalls that carved out this land and gave it so much biomass.
So why not instead of all of us south Cascadians flocking to Canada we could suggest Oregon, Washington, northern California, Idaho and western Montana with the Alaskan panhandle re-unify with British Columbia as part of Canada. This region was once considered a one region before the US under expansionist policies by president Jackson and Polk divided the region. It could be a campaign like after the fall of the Berlin Wall to re-unify Germany: "Re-unification of Cascadia!" Just imagine Seattle, Portland, San Fransisco, Vancouver (BC), Victoria and the whole Cascadian bioregion (rural and urban) working together either as Cascadia or under a Canadian Confederation.
cascadians.tribe.net
-
Re: Moving to Canada? What about annexation instead?
Sat, July 2, 2005 - 4:39 AM
-
Re: Moving to Canada? What about annexation instead?
Thu, July 21, 2005 - 12:08 PMSounds like another variation on the old "54-40, or fight!" syndrome. :-) -
-
Re: Moving to Canada? What about annexation instead?
Thu, July 21, 2005 - 1:19 PMfunny you should say that.. in some ways its would be undoing what Polk and his American expansionist policy did. Imagine a reunited Cascadia as Canada's largest province including San Fransisco , Portland and Seattle. We could include all of California if they chose too. -
-
Re: Moving to Canada? What about annexation instead?
Fri, July 29, 2005 - 11:21 AMBe careful what you wish for! Could you tolerate co-existing with Los Angeles, Orange, and San Diego counties of California? -
-
Re: Moving to Canada? What about annexation instead?
Fri, July 29, 2005 - 7:10 PMOr the gun-slinging capital of the west - Orygun.
Naw, I prefer escaping to my ol safe-and friendly haven of the north.
Besides, we'd lose the tag "great white north" wouldn't we? Along with the "true north" segment of "true north, strong and free". -
-
Re: Moving to Canada? What about annexation instead?
Sat, July 30, 2005 - 1:35 AMWell Alaska has you beat with some of that.. except maybe free -
-
Re: Moving to Canada? What about annexation instead?
Sat, October 8, 2005 - 7:04 PMUm, no. - Ellesmere Island is way-farther north than Alaska.
-
-
Re: Moving to Canada? What about annexation instead?
Sat, July 30, 2005 - 1:41 AMlisten no one is telling you to go south of the border just that some of us in Oregon and Washington would like to be annexed or even look into our past as a united region. We have our friends and family and animals and trees here and we do not feel like the US is our country and to run is not a real solution either...lol even though I am leaving too...lol -
-
Re: Moving to Canada? What about annexation instead?
Sat, July 30, 2005 - 2:49 AMsorry if I was in a snit while writing that. Listen I love British Columbia and Oregon, Washington, Idaho and northern California. I just get sick of Americans (patritoic or expatriots) who think of themselves only and not of the people stuck under tyrrany. Personally if I was Canadian I would be tempted to say "go deal with your problems south!" Yes I tell people everyday "get the hell out of this country now especially if you have kids or draft age teens", but most look at me wierdly or tell me they can not because of work or family or aging grandparents or other life situations. And as you who have money know it is not that easy to immigrate.
Many of those in BC I have talked to feel more akin to Oregonians and Washingtonians than to the Eastern Canadians. We had some British Columbians (northern Cascadians) visiting several months ago who said they do not feel represented by the current Canadian government yet fear out right the US government (which I agree there is reason to fear). Yet they were talling us they feel like Oregonians were closer to them than eastern Canadians. Yet this is not praise for Oregon and Washington in which both states are continously about to economically collapse. I think Oregon and Washington and the rest of US controlled Cascadia would fair better under a Canadian flag or its own flag.
-
-
Re: Moving to Canada? What about annexation instead?
Sat, July 30, 2005 - 3:01 AMoops I meant I tell people in the US to "get the hell out of this country now especially if you have kids or draft age teens"
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Unsu...
Re: Moving to Canada? What about annexation instead?
Sat, July 30, 2005 - 11:43 PMI'm for it, so long as you cut off the line just below Portland, or right at Portland. Southern Oregon is fucking awful! Don't drag California along, they created their mess and can keep it to themselves. -
-
Re: Moving to Canada? What about annexation instead?
Tue, October 18, 2005 - 4:43 PMHey now...
Northern CA didn't vote into office a foriegn nationalist who is having his birth nation disown him for supporting the death penalty... That was engineered by the media saturated south.
Stretch down along the treeline along the coast, and you'll find open minds.
Besides, if Cascadia had it's own boundary, we could stop the flow of water to LA and all the golf courses would be desert again.... -
-
Re: Moving to Canada? What about annexation instead?
Wed, July 18, 2007 - 9:23 PMForgive me for digging up ancient posts but I'm a newbie so I'm just replying to things of interest to me right now. I never heard of the "biogregion" thing before nor the history of "Cacadia", and I found it interesting. I think many of the "counterpart cities" on the US/Canadian border, and even the surrounding regions to share quite a bit of similarities between terrain and way of life. I grew up in the Upper Peninsula of Michigan and near Sault St. Marie, and I think in many ways it has prepared me very well for making a possible move to Canada soon. Similar terrain (which I absolutely love), similar economy and industry, and similar attitudes. Not to mention I already sound Canadian (Say "out and about in a boat" :p ) so it should be an easy transition in that regard, LOL. -
-
Re: Moving to Canada? What about annexation instead?
Thu, July 19, 2007 - 5:46 AMNo !
Have you seen..just for 1 example....the difference in clear cut logging while driving from Vancouver to Bellingham....shheeesh !
I like the borders just as they are....even the amount of trash seen on the side of the highways....not cool below the 49th !
I don't think that it'd be cool for Canada to have to supply so much of our fresh water to places like California !
The United States wasted all it's natural resourses on becoming the world power that they are today....Don't start coming up with hairbrained ideas about getting yer greedy fingers on our natural resourses in Canada!
I like Canada just the way it is and I'll defend it tooth and nail !
Americans have destroyed their country ! -
-
Re: Moving to Canada? What about annexation instead?
Mon, August 27, 2007 - 5:29 AMwell our forestry on both sides of the border needs a total rehaul.
-
-
-
-